Zeev Turchinsky | Architecture & Innovation Leadership Portfolio
30+ yrs
architecture & technology leadership
20+ plants
landscape mapped
22 ERPs
consolidation context
300+ apps
transparency created
€1M+
annual savings potential
30%
knowledge retrieval uplift
Selected Case Studies
Case 1. Enterprise Architecture foundation for a fragmented manufacturing group - enabling €1M+ annual savings potential
| Challenge | My actions | Impact |
- Fragmented post-acquisition IT landscape with limited shared visibility.
- ERP consolidation and application rationalization required fact-based decisions.
|
- Built architecture baseline across applications, ERPs, capabilities, integrations and priorities.
- Implemented ABACUS repository and linked Enterprise Architecture with Solution Architecture deliverables.
- Defined D365 FSCM target options, integration strategy, MDM roadmap and process/system mapping.
|
- Improved decision traceability and architectural consistency.
- Enabled rationalization decisions and established foundation for ERP transformation, integration modernization and MDM.
|
Case 2. Data, integration and AI roadmap in a SAP-centric manufacturing environment
| Challenge | My actions | Impact |
- Business needed better integration transparency, data availability and architecture governance.
- AI opportunities needed business-value and readiness-based prioritization.
|
- Developed Enterprise Architecture strategy and governance framework.
- Designed Azure Data Analytics Platform using ADF, Databricks and Data Lake concepts.
- Defined AI assessment, use-case evaluation, roadmap and MDM/data ownership direction.
|
- Improved alignment between business priorities, data initiatives and architecture decisions.
- Created pragmatic AI roadmap and strengthened traceability between strategy, solution design and delivery.
|
Case 3. Metadata-driven Azure data platform architecture for governed analytics delivery
| Challenge | My actions | Impact |
- Analytics delivery needed better data availability, reusable patterns and stronger governance.
- One-off ingestion approaches created scalability and onboarding constraints.
|
- Designed metadata-driven ingestion architecture and Data Lake structure.
- Defined data zones, ingestion patterns, transformation logic and data ownership concepts.
- Aligned business stakeholders, delivery teams and technology partners.
|
- Created scalable foundation for analytics expansion and faster data source onboarding.
- Strengthened data governance and cloud architecture decision-making for reporting and supply-chain analytics.
|
Case 4. Architecture governance and design assurance in regulated banking
| Challenge | My actions | Impact |
- Regulated organizations needed modernization while meeting compliance, security and risk expectations.
- Regulatory deadlines created pressure for expensive or short-term technology choices.
|
- Led architecture practices, standards and design assurance across banking environments.
- Created SOA/BPM roadmaps and led technical RFP work for ESB, BPM and digital platforms.
- Challenged a planned software purchase and proposed ESB-based orchestration.
|
- Supported regulatory delivery while reducing unnecessary cost and complexity.
- Built a strong foundation in executive advisory, governance, integration and regulated-environment architecture.
|
Architecture Leadership Pattern
| Pattern | How I use it |
| Start with the business problem | Clarify objective, stakeholders, decision context, constraints and success metrics before selecting technology. |
| Create landscape transparency | Map capabilities, processes, applications, ERP systems, integrations, data ownership and pain points. |
| Define target direction | Build target-state options, transition scenarios and trade-offs between speed, cost, risk and standardization. |
| Govern for decisions | Use principles, standards, review criteria, decision records and ownership models as enabling mechanisms. |
| Link to measurable value | Connect architecture work to cost avoidance, rationalization, risk reduction, scalability, data quality and delivery confidence. |